Cartographic Abstraction

Purpose of lecture:

  • mention what wasn't included in last lecture
  • introduce processes that transform data into maps
  • prepare for lab meetings IN MAP LIBRARY
  • another excuse to show off some maps

  • More points about Geographic Data

    Muehrcke's Chapter 2 is full of random snippets (as is chapter 3, as well). A few of these didn't fit the theme last time, but bear some recognition.

    Sources of Data (Acquisition Methods):

    "Inventory Scheme":

    This is a rather odd title, it really belongs with the acquisition methods, somehow)

    "Spatial Prediction":

    This is another odd title, I would call this transformations

    Derived values

    This section introduces a lot of issues that we will cover later...


    Cartographic Abstraction

    Muehrcke lists five processes:

  • Selection
  • Classification
  • Simplification
  • Exaggeration
  • Symbolization

  • Selection

    This is a grab-bag of items, some of which are vaguely related to abstraction, and some of which are more tangential (or just not a good fit).

    Region, time frame and "variables to be mapped" are the components of time, space and attribute. What doesn't fit as well is the "selection", these three are not really treated equivalently...

    Scale is mentioned (see lecture 10), then it spends six pages on "perspective". Lecture 12 and the lab will deal with projections, the rest about oblique perspective might be used for ski areas, but very little else.


    Classification

    Here, the cartographic abstraction begins in earnest.

    As described in the last lecture, categories are the basis of objects, and thus a lot of mapping.

    The main question should deal with

    BUT, Muehrcke deals primarily with a thematic problem of

    Selecting Class Intervals

    This is the situation of having a number (interval/ratio) for a discrete set of objects (eg. counties)

    First choice: how many classes

  • two is probably oversimplified,
  • five to seven works for map displays
  • huge number only works for very smooth data
  • Second choices: where to set the class breaks

    The risks:
  • badly distributed attribute vales reduce the information content
  • empty classes,
  • clustered so that whole map in one class (with exception of Milwaukee in example on page 71)
  • The normal approaches

  • Equal Intervals (constant along the attribute number line)
  • Quantiles (equal in number of objects in a class)
  • Systematically varying intervals (log scale, doublings, etc.)
  • "Natural Breaks" (attempt to optimize by various methods
  • This topic is treated in more depth in Geog 360, as a part of making maps...


    Simplification

    Comes in roughly two forms: geometric and attribute.

    In both cases, reduce the information content and resolution.


    Exaggeration

    Oh, yes it happens. But somehow this is more an issue of a collision between other components of the mapping process, not an objective in itself.

    Example: river, railroad tracks, road. The road usually cannot be shown as close to the river as it is in fact, because the railroad symbol is wider than the actual railroad (at scale)....


    Symbolization

    Finally, we get to the heart of cartography: Using symbols to play the role of objects.

    Mentions imagery (false color and photographic process - see lectures on remote sensing and images (06,07).

    Core of symbolism: graphic semiology (systems of signs)

    (other cartographers would alter this list slightly, but it will do for us)


    In Map Library exercise, you will be looking for class intervals and map symbols...


    Version of 9 December 1999