Discussion 3

Case Study on Institutional Arrangements, Policies and Social Consequences

Purpose

A Geographic Information System as a technical operation exists within a framework of social and institutional arrangements. It has long been apparent that many of these arrangments deserve as much care in designing an effective system.

There are many models for the institutional arrangments around a GIS, and these models have been changing rapidly. In particular, there are substiantial differences in how data development has been funded at different levels of government in different places. The connection between society and technology is a subject of substantial research, with direct bearing on the practice of GIS.


This discussion event will provide support for the individual essay that is a part of the Project assignment due on 10 December.

Each student is responsible to write a distinct (individually signed) component investigating ONE of the data sources used in your project. This section will identify the original source of your data, any intermediaries and transformations they may have performed, and the custodian from whom you obtained the data. (This can be considered a "chain of custody".) Consider questions such as the "mandate" of each organization, their level of resources available (budget, personnel, equipment), and the approach they took to measurement and representation. This should be a 1-2 page essay that will receive a weight of 5% on the total course grade.

Agencies that are likely sources:

US Government

US Geological Survey (Mapping Division now called Geography)

Full details are contained in two reports (dated 30 November 2001):

Fish and Wildlife Service

Natural Resources Conservation Service (used to be Soil Conservation Service)

For comparison: some other countries:

Who is going to pay for it?

State Agencies

County Government

Municipal Government

City of Seattle Common database content; available data; ; ordering data; FAQ with a few prices; standard CDs.


 

B. Resolved: One agency must take responsibility for the whole geospatial data infrastructure

Pro: National Map places this in the hands of USGS

Anti: Responsibility must be shared, lower levels of government have a greater stake in accuracy, completeness and updates....

 

C. Resolved: All digital data must be given away for free.

Pro: National Map presents this as a free, universal service

National Wetlands Inventory; overview.

for something more cosmic: Digital Earth.

Anti:


Guidelines to write the essay:

Each student is responsible to write a distinct (individually signed) component investigating ONE of the data sources used in your project. This essay will identify the original source of your data, any intermediaries and transformations they may have performed, and the custodian from whom you obtained the data. (This can be considered a "chain of custody".) Consider questions such as the "mandate" of each organization, their level of resources available (budget, personnel, equipment), and the approach they took to measurement and representation.

This should be a 1-2 page essay that will receive a weight of 5% on the total course grade.


Review of objectives:

  1. Pick one of the data sources used in your project.
  2. Attempt to trace this data source (back from WAGDA!) to the originating agency.
  3. Find out what you can about WHY they generated this data in the first place and HOW they disseminate it (access policies, charges, restrictions, etc.)
  4. Compare this to some alternatives in other places and other agencies
  5. Discuss your preliminary findings in the class session (1/2 December.
  6. Produce a short (2 page) essay (individual) that , DUE with your project (team) report


Index from Here: | Main Index | Schedule of Lectures | Schedule of Labs | How to reach us
Version of 24 November 2003